Why wasn't the Indian Air Force (IAF) used against the advancing Chinese
in the 1962 war? For over 50 years, strategic thinkers, military historians and
amateur hacks have postulated various theories either justifying or decrying
the decision by India not to employ air power in the month-long war with China
fought in the shadow of the Himalaya. Very few could however proffer a cogent
explanation. Half a century later, we may now have the first detailed, reasoned
and fact-based account about what exactly transpired in those tumultous days of
the war and the build up before that.
Air Marshal Bharat Kumar, an air veteran of 1959 vintage has come up
with an extremely well-researched book Unknown & Unsung:
Indian Air Force in Sino-Indian War of 1962 which should put at rest the 50-year old speculation over the puzzling
decision not to press India's combat air power in the conflict. Through
meticulous research, backed by internal documents accessed from Air HQs, from US and UK archives and
other relevant correspondence of the time, Air Marshal Bharat Kumar has served
up a fascinating account that unveils hitherto unknown facets of the IAF's
contribution to the 1962 war and conclusively demolishes various myths built up
over the past five decades.
First, he effectively demonstrates the laudable role played by the IAF's transport fleet, both fixed wing and helicopters before and during the 1962 war. Several unconventional and
sometimes downright suicidal methods were adopted by air warriors to support
the land forces in the downright hostile and inhospitable terrain.
For instance, most of us are familiar with the heroic battle fought by
the Kumaonis at Rezang La, but it is hardly known how brave pilots of AN-12
loaded AMX 13 light tanks to be airlifted to Chushul which had a makeshift
airstrip. The tanks fitted in the aircraft alright but the weight of the tank
damaged the floor of the aircraft in the first attempt. Local juggad came to the rescue but the all-up
weight of the aircraft far exceeded the permissible limits for takeoff.
The Captain then decided to reduce the all-up weight to permissible
limits by offloading most of fuel even though it meant he would barely have
fuel to make the Chandigarh-Chushul-Chandigarh run that too after keeping the
engine running at Chushul as the tank was to be offloaded! This meant there
would be no cushion available in case of any diversion necessitated by the treacherous
weather. The only alternative would have been a crash! Despite the risk, two
AMX 13 tanks and their troops were airlifted to Chushul giving the Army the
much needed back up during the battle of Chushul.
In NEFA (now Arunachal Pradesh) too it is not common knowledge that
10-12 Otter aircraft (with a seating capacity of 10) switched an entire brigade
laterally in less than 72 hours. Air dropping supplies to NEFA and Ladakh was
also done beyond the IAF's existing capability.
But the most interesting part of the book for me is the part where Air
Marshal Bharat Kumar reveals different events, views and inputs that led Prime
Minister Nehru and Defence Minister Krishna Menon not to employ combat air
power. He has used a mix of personal interviews with people like Air Marshal HC
Dewan (who was Group Capt in 1962 and Director of Operations in the Air HQ),
official history, personal notes and declassified papers in US and UK to
broaden our understanding of that inexplicable decision. In the chapter: Why No Indian Combat Air Power? The Guilty Men of 1962 , Air Marshal Bharat Kumar has analysed in great detail the usual reasons
cited so far for NOT deploying combat air power. They are:
- US Ambassador JK Galbraith's
advice against use of air power
- The Army's opposition
- Lack of Army/Air Force joint
planning
- Failure of the Joint
Intelligence organisation
- Air Marshal Dewan's note
- Role of then Air Chief AM
Engineer
- Role of Intelligence Bureau
- Role of Bureaucracy
- Failure of higher defence
organisation
- Jawaharlal Nehru's own
decisions
The last
line in this chapter, "Deciding not to use the Air Force was an act of not
only shooting oneself but, in addition, going into the fight with one's arms
tied behind one's back. There was just too many odds against India," sums
up the despair felt by many military and strategic thinkers.
The lesson from that mistake in 1962 is self-evident: Air combat power is the most potent weapon in any conflict and must be used at an appropriate time. As the current air chief, Air Chief Marshal NAK Browne said last October: "These are open and glaring lessons we should have imbibed. I can assure you there will be no such limitation. The IAF will play a leading role in not just against that or any other sector but anywhere whenever the need arises.”
The book
is a product of a thorough, painstaking research, has some excellent maps and
many rare photographs. It chronicles many unsung exploits of air warriors,
hitherto unknown. The Centre for Airpower Studies and the author deserve
appreciation of all students of military history. At 880 rupees the book's price may seem a little steep but for those of us who want to understand the past to make sense of the future, this is a small price to pay.
Unknown & Unsung (Indian Air Force in Sino-Indian war of 1962)
Knowledge World; ISBN 978-93-81904-41-1; Rs 880
Not fair and correct understanding of facts and warfare. In case the than Chief of Air Force disagree with act of Civilian Government in running of war, he must had resigned atonce. Such act would had caused no loss to his pension but only loss of bribes in defence procurement. Corruption induced + HR Abuser defence forces are no guarantee for any safety + protection. This is fact of present day India life.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteBe clear about one thing--in times of war it Is the military and the political hierarchy which takes decisions as to the conduct of all defensive and offensive operations .No outsiders are involved unless the Nation is either on the brink of defeat ,or is not sure of its own military and diplomatic strength against an enemy who has proved itself to be stronger.
ReplyDeleteWhether use of offensive air power would have tilted the balance in favour of India , at a time when the Army and the Nation were not giving a very good account of of itself , is a moot point and we can make all sorts of conjectures now. May be if we had used the Indian Navy to seal the SLOC's Westwards from the Malacca Straits onwards , the Chinese may have sued for peace!! But we did not use the Navy aggressively!
Viewed pragmatically , the Country was not only militarily unprepared to fight a war but frankly speaking the National will and resolve was also lacking. As Indians , it was definitely not our finest hour--we were ready to buckle to soon. England,under the leadership of Churchill fought for more than a year against vastly superior forces --all alone. Sorry , but I disagree if now it is being said that the 'Government/Nehru' did not approve the ' use of the IAF '.
http://papyrustony.blogspot.in/2013/11/much-ado-about-nothing-1962-and-beyond.html
I do not mean to denigrate any one or belittle the sacrifices done by the brave men of the Indian Army and the IAF, but it is important to put on record certain unpleasant facts.Viewed pragmatically , the Country was not only militarily unprepared to fight a war but frankly speaking the National will and resolve was also lacking. As Indians , it was definitely not our finest hour--we were ready to buckle to soon. England,under the leadership of Churchill fought for more than a year against vastly superior forces --all alone. Sorry , but I disagree if now it is being said that the 'Government/Nehru' did not approve the ' use of the IAF '.
ReplyDeleteBy no means am I disparaging the valiant effort of the soldiers and the airmen who did what they did to the extent possible.---
Viewed pragmatically , the Country was not only militarily unprepared to fight a war but frankly speaking the National will and resolve was also lacking. As Indians , it was definitely not our finest hour--we were ready to buckle to soon. England,under the leadership of Churchill fought for more than a year against vastly superior forces --all alone. Sorry , but I disagree if now it is being said that the 'Government/Nehru' did not approve the ' use of the IAF '.
By no means am I disparaging the valiant effort of the soldiers and the airmen who did what they did to the extent possible.---
http://papyrustony.blogspot.in/2013/11/much-ado-about-nothing-1962-and-beyond.html